CBSE Mathematics · 2026–27 · Class 11
Three awkward fractions can become a tidy line of logarithms. The trick is to see products, denominators and powers before doing arithmetic. Each rule below comes from the same idea: logarithms return exponents.
- Explain the product and quotient rules using exponents.
- Expand and condense expressions with one common base.
- Distinguish a power on the argument from a power on the base.
- Retain the original domain, including negative-variable cases involving squares.
- Use prime factorisation to check logarithm coefficients.
Why multiplication becomes addition
Take two positive numbers that are powers of the same valid base: and , where and . Their product is . A logarithm asks for that exponent, so
This is the product rule. It works in both directions. You can expand one logarithm of a product into a sum, or condense a sum of same-base logarithms into one logarithm.
Notice what the rule does not say. does not generally equal . For instance, with base 2 and , the first expression is , while the proposed sum is .
Before using factor tiles, predict the combined exponent. Keep every logged factor positive and use one common base. You cannot directly combine with this rule: the two terms measure exponents using different bases.
Work it through
Worked example: condense . The same-base sum becomes . The exponent view gives the same result: , , so . Both arguments are positive, and the common base 2 is valid. We added exponents because we multiplied powers; we did not add the numbers 32 and 16.
Enable JavaScript to explore the inputs. The explanation and worked example remain available here.
Pause. Think. Try.
A denominator contributes a minus sign
Division of matching-base powers subtracts their exponents: . The corresponding logarithm rule is
The base must again be positive and different from 1. Read the subtraction in order: numerator first, denominator second. Reversing the fraction changes the sign of its logarithm.
With several factors, organise the fraction before expanding. For positive ,
Both denominator factors receive minus signs. Writing the denominator as one parenthesised product helps: subtracting subtracts the whole sum .
Those positive-factor conditions matter. The number is positive, so its logarithm exists, but expanding it as creates undefined real logarithms. A positive combined argument alone does not justify every possible expansion.
Work it through
Worked example: expand and evaluate . All factors are positive. The expansion is . Checking the argument directly, , so . This second route is a quick way to catch a misplaced denominator sign.
Pause. Think. Try.
A power comes down—but keep the domain
For a positive number , a valid base and any real exponent ,
To see why, let , so . Then , whose logarithm is . The rule handles positive, negative and fractional powers: a square root contributes a factor , while a reciprocal contributes a factor .
The condition is essential for that general statement. A square creates a useful special case. For any real , the argument is positive, even when is negative. The form that preserves its whole domain is
Here is the nonnegative magnitude, or absolute value (निरपेक्ष मान). Because , it is strictly positive. Writing instead would wrongly discard every negative . A simpler-looking expression is only equivalent where its logarithms still exist.
Work it through
Worked example: evaluate at . Directly, , so the value is . The domain-preserving expansion gives . The expression is undefined and cannot be used. Separately, with positive argument 27, the general power rule gives .
Pause. Think. Try.
A power on the base divides the answer
A power on the base behaves differently from a power on the argument. With , , and real ,
Let . By definition, , or . Thus , and dividing by gives the rule. If , the new base would be , which is not allowed.
When both positions carry powers, combine the two operations:
The conditions are unchanged, with any real number. A negative is allowed; it makes the new base a reciprocal power. A zero is allowed too: the argument becomes 1 and the logarithm becomes zero.
Use the two power controls separately before changing both. Say what changed out loud: “the argument power multiplies; the base power divides”. This helps prevent applying the argument rule to the small subscript.
Work it through
Worked example: compare and . Use and . Then , while . Check the second directly: . Finally, .
Enable JavaScript to explore the inputs. The explanation and worked example remain available here.
Pause. Think. Try.
Let prime factors carry the arithmetic
When several same-base logarithms contain fractions, a dependable route is condense, factor, cancel, expand. Condense only after confirming that every original argument is positive. Then use exact fractions rather than rounded decimals.
Prime factorisation turns large-looking numbers into a short exponent record. For example, , , and . Equal prime factors cancel between numerator and denominator by subtracting exponents.
The remaining exponents become logarithm coefficients. A prime in the denominator produces a negative coefficient. A prime that cancels completely has coefficient zero; you should not invent a leftover term just because the question mentions it.
Keep the common base visible throughout. The arithmetic below works for any , , not only base 10. Once you have an answer, check it backwards: turn the coefficients into powers and reconstruct the fraction. That inverse check catches both dropped factors and reversed signs.
Work it through
Worked example: simplify .
Therefore the sum is . The coefficient 4 belongs to : the surviving factor is , not 2. Rebuilding confirms 240.
Pause. Think. Try.
Your chapter checkpoint
Mix the ideas. Try each question before opening its explanation.
Write the reasoning
Show the domain, the key steps and a check of your answer.
A complete coefficient challenge
For a valid common base , simplify . Give the coefficients of , in that order.
Compare your solution
All three arguments are positive, so condense their sum. The exact product is
Its logarithm is . The requested coefficients are therefore . Multiplying the prime powers back gives , confirming both negative signs.
Expand without losing negative inputs
Find the real domain of , and expand it in a form valid on that whole domain.
Compare your solution
The argument must be positive. At it is zero; at the denominator is zero. For all other , the numerator is positive, so the quotient is positive exactly when . The domain is .
On this domain, both and are positive, giving
For example, is allowed: its original argument is . Using would wrongly remove this valid input.
You can turn a calculation into a structure
You can recognise products, quotients and powers—and keep the domain while rewriting them. Try the prime-factor example backwards, then explore what logarithms look like on a graph.
