Logarithm Laws: See the Structure Before Calculating

CBSE Mathematics · 2026–27 · Class 11

Learn with Rajesh Sir

Three awkward fractions can become a tidy line of logarithms. The trick is to see products, denominators and powers before doing arithmetic. Each rule below comes from the same idea: logarithms return exponents.

By the end, you can…
  • Explain the product and quotient rules using exponents.
  • Expand and condense expressions with one common base.
  • Distinguish a power on the argument from a power on the base.
  • Retain the original domain, including negative-variable cases involving squares.
  • Use prime factorisation to check logarithm coefficients.
About 5 minutes
TOPIC 01Class 11

Why multiplication becomes addition

Take two positive numbers that are powers of the same valid base: M=buM=b^u and N=bvN=b^v, where b>0b>0 and b≠1b\ne1. Their product is MN=bu+vMN=b^{u+v}. A logarithm asks for that exponent, so

log⁡b(MN)=log⁡bM+log⁡bN(M,N>0).\log_b(MN)=\log_b M+\log_b N\qquad(M,N>0).

This is the product rule. It works in both directions. You can expand one logarithm of a product into a sum, or condense a sum of same-base logarithms into one logarithm.

Notice what the rule does not say. log⁡b(M+N)\log_b(M+N) does not generally equal log⁡bM+log⁡bN\log_b M+\log_b N. For instance, with base 2 and M=N=1M=N=1, the first expression is log⁡22=1\log_2 2=1, while the proposed sum is 0+0=00+0=0.

Before using factor tiles, predict the combined exponent. Keep every logged factor positive and use one common base. You cannot directly combine log⁡2M+log⁡3N\log_2 M+\log_3 N with this rule: the two terms measure exponents using different bases.

Work it through

Worked example: condense log⁡232+log⁡216\log_2 32+\log_2 16. The same-base sum becomes log⁡2(32×16)=log⁡2512=9\log_2(32\times16)=\log_2 512=9. The exponent view gives the same result: 32=2532=2^5, 16=2416=2^4, so 32×16=25+4=2932\times16=2^{5+4}=2^9. Both arguments are positive, and the common base 2 is valid. We added exponents because we multiplied powers; we did not add the numbers 32 and 16.

Enable JavaScript to explore the inputs. The explanation and worked example remain available here.

Pause. Think. Try.

1. For x>0x>0 and y>0y>0, which equals log⁡5x+log⁡5y\log_5 x+\log_5 y?
A hint, pleaseA sum of logarithms comes from which operation on their positive arguments?
Read the answer and explanation

log⁡5(xy)\log_5(xy)

The product rule gives log⁡5(xy)\log_5(xy). The positivity conditions ensure each original logarithm exists.
2. Which calculation disproves the proposed identity log⁡2(M+N)=log⁡2M+log⁡2N\log_2(M+N)=\log_2 M+\log_2 N for all positive M,NM,N?
A hint, pleaseOne valid counterexample is enough; all its logarithms must exist.
Read the answer and explanation

At M=N=1M=N=1, the left side is 1 and the right side is 0.

With M=N=1M=N=1, all arguments are valid, but log⁡22=1≠0=log⁡21+log⁡21\log_2 2=1\ne0=\log_2 1+\log_2 1. An accidental equality at other values does not establish an identity.
About 5 minutes
TOPIC 02Class 11

A denominator contributes a minus sign

Division of matching-base powers subtracts their exponents: bu/bv=bu−vb^u/b^v=b^{u-v}. The corresponding logarithm rule is

log⁡b ⁣(MN)=log⁡bM−log⁡bN(M,N>0).\log_b\!\left(\frac{M}{N}\right)=\log_b M-\log_b N\qquad(M,N>0).

The base must again be positive and different from 1. Read the subtraction in order: numerator first, denominator second. Reversing the fraction changes the sign of its logarithm.

With several factors, organise the fraction before expanding. For positive x,y,z,p,qx,y,z,p,q,

log⁡b ⁣(xyzpq)=log⁡bx+log⁡by+log⁡bz−log⁡bp−log⁡bq.\log_b\!\left(\frac{xyz}{pq}\right)=\log_b x+\log_b y+\log_b z-\log_b p-\log_b q.

Both denominator factors receive minus signs. Writing the denominator as one parenthesised product helps: subtracting log⁡b(pq)\log_b(pq) subtracts the whole sum log⁡bp+log⁡bq\log_b p+\log_b q.

Those positive-factor conditions matter. The number (−6)/(−3)=2(-6)/(-3)=2 is positive, so its logarithm exists, but expanding it as log⁡b(−6)−log⁡b(−3)\log_b(-6)-\log_b(-3) creates undefined real logarithms. A positive combined argument alone does not justify every possible expansion.

Work it through

Worked example: expand and evaluate log⁡2((8×4)/16)\log_2\bigl((8\times4)/16\bigr). All factors are positive. The expansion is log⁡28+log⁡24−log⁡216=3+2−4=1\log_2 8+\log_2 4-\log_2 16=3+2-4=1. Checking the argument directly, (8×4)/16=2(8\times4)/16=2, so log⁡22=1\log_2 2=1. This second route is a quick way to catch a misplaced denominator sign.

Pause. Think. Try.

1. For positive x,p,qx,p,q, which equals log⁡3(x/(pq))\log_3(x/(pq))?
A hint, pleaseFirst subtract the logarithm of the whole denominator.
Read the answer and explanation

log⁡3x−log⁡3p−log⁡3q\log_3 x-\log_3 p-\log_3 q

log⁡3x−log⁡3(pq)=log⁡3x−(log⁡3p+log⁡3q)\log_3 x-\log_3(pq)=\log_3 x-(\log_3 p+\log_3 q). Both denominator logs are subtracted.
2. Why is log⁡2((−6)/(−3))=log⁡2(−6)−log⁡2(−3)\log_2((-6)/(-3))=\log_2(-6)-\log_2(-3) not a valid real-log expansion?
A hint, pleaseCheck the original argument and the proposed individual arguments separately.
Read the answer and explanation

Because the separate logarithms have negative arguments.

The original argument is 2, so its logarithm is 1. But log⁡2(−6)\log_2(-6) and log⁡2(−3)\log_2(-3) are not real. The positive-factor form of the quotient rule cannot be used here.
About 6 minutes
TOPIC 03Class 11

A power comes down—but keep the domain

For a positive number xx, a valid base bb and any real exponent rr,

log⁡b(xr)=rlog⁡bx.\log_b(x^r)=r\log_b x.

To see why, let u=log⁡bxu=\log_b x, so x=bux=b^u. Then xr=burx^r=b^{ur}, whose logarithm is urur. The rule handles positive, negative and fractional powers: a square root contributes a factor 1/21/2, while a reciprocal contributes a factor −1-1.

The condition x>0x>0 is essential for that general statement. A square creates a useful special case. For any real x≠0x\ne0, the argument x2x^2 is positive, even when xx is negative. The form that preserves its whole domain is

log⁡b(x2)=2log⁡b∣x∣(x≠0).\log_b(x^2)=2\log_b|x|\qquad(x\ne0).

Here ∣x∣|x| is the nonnegative magnitude, or absolute value (निरपेक्ष मान). Because x≠0x\ne0, it is strictly positive. Writing 2log⁡bx2\log_b x instead would wrongly discard every negative xx. A simpler-looking expression is only equivalent where its logarithms still exist.

Work it through

Worked example: evaluate log⁡2(x2)\log_2(x^2) at x=−4x=-4. Directly, x2=16x^2=16, so the value is log⁡216=4\log_2 16=4. The domain-preserving expansion gives 2log⁡2∣−4∣=2log⁡24=42\log_2|-4|=2\log_2 4=4. The expression 2log⁡2(−4)2\log_2(-4) is undefined and cannot be used. Separately, with positive argument 27, the general power rule gives log⁡327=12log⁡327=32\log_3\sqrt{27}=\tfrac12\log_3 27=\tfrac32.

Pause. Think. Try.

1. What is log⁡232\log_2\sqrt{32}?
A hint, pleaseWrite the square root as a power of 1/21/2.
Read the answer and explanation

5/25/2

log⁡2(321/2)=12log⁡232=12×5=5/2\log_2(32^{1/2})=\tfrac12\log_2 32=\tfrac12\times5=5/2. The argument 32 is positive.
2. Which expression equals log⁡3(x2)\log_3(x^2) for every real x≠0x\ne0?
A hint, pleaseThe original square allows negative as well as positive xx.
Read the answer and explanation

2log⁡3∣x∣2\log_3|x|

x2=∣x∣2x^2=|x|^2 and ∣x∣>0|x|>0 for x≠0x\ne0. Thus the power rule applies to ∣x∣|x|, giving 2log⁡3∣x∣2\log_3|x|.
About 6 minutes
TOPIC 04Class 11

A power on the base divides the answer

A power on the base behaves differently from a power on the argument. With a>0a>0, a≠1a\ne1, x>0x>0 and real n≠0n\ne0,

log⁡anx=1nlog⁡ax.\log_{a^n}x=\frac1n\log_a x.

Let t=log⁡anxt=\log_{a^n}x. By definition, (an)t=x(a^n)^t=x, or ant=xa^{nt}=x. Thus nt=log⁡axnt=\log_a x, and dividing by nn gives the rule. If n=0n=0, the new base would be a0=1a^0=1, which is not allowed.

When both positions carry powers, combine the two operations:

log⁡an(xm)=mnlog⁡ax.\log_{a^n}(x^m)=\frac{m}{n}\log_a x.

The conditions are unchanged, with mm any real number. A negative nn is allowed; it makes the new base a reciprocal power. A zero mm is allowed too: the argument becomes 1 and the logarithm becomes zero.

Use the two power controls separately before changing both. Say what changed out loud: “the argument power multiplies; the base power divides”. This helps prevent applying the argument rule to the small subscript.

Work it through

Worked example: compare log⁡48\log_4 8 and log⁡1/48\log_{1/4}8. Use 4=224=2^2 and 1/4=2−21/4=2^{-2}. Then log⁡48=12log⁡28=3/2\log_4 8=\tfrac12\log_2 8=3/2, while log⁡1/48=−12log⁡28=−3/2\log_{1/4}8=-\tfrac12\log_2 8=-3/2. Check the second directly: (1/4)−3/2=43/2=8(1/4)^{-3/2}=4^{3/2}=8. Finally, log⁡4(82)=22log⁡28=3\log_4(8^2)=\tfrac22\log_2 8=3.

Enable JavaScript to explore the inputs. The explanation and worked example remain available here.

Pause. Think. Try.

1. What is log⁡4(82)\log_4(8^2)?
A hint, pleaseWrite the base as 222^2; then apply the two power factors.
Read the answer and explanation

33

log⁡22(82)=22log⁡28=3\log_{2^2}(8^2)=\tfrac22\log_2 8=3. Equivalently, 82=64=438^2=64=4^3.
2. In log⁡2n8\log_{2^n}8, why must n≠0n\ne0?
A hint, pleaseInspect the base when n=0n=0.
Read the answer and explanation

Because 20=12^0=1 would make the logarithm base invalid.

The logarithm base becomes 1, which cannot identify a unique exponent. Negative nn are allowed: 2n2^n stays positive and different from 1.
About 6 minutes
TOPIC 05Class 11

Let prime factors carry the arithmetic

When several same-base logarithms contain fractions, a dependable route is condense, factor, cancel, expand. Condense only after confirming that every original argument is positive. Then use exact fractions rather than rounded decimals.

Prime factorisation turns large-looking numbers into a short exponent record. For example, 125=53125=5^3, 81=3481=3^4, 64=2664=2^6 and 243=35243=3^5. Equal prime factors cancel between numerator and denominator by subtracting exponents.

The remaining exponents become logarithm coefficients. A prime in the denominator produces a negative coefficient. A prime that cancels completely has coefficient zero; you should not invent a leftover term just because the question mentions it.

Keep the common base visible throughout. The arithmetic below works for any b>0b>0, b≠1b\ne1, not only base 10. Once you have an answer, check it backwards: turn the coefficients into powers and reconstruct the fraction. That inverse check catches both dropped factors and reversed signs.

Work it through

Worked example: simplify log⁡b(125/81)+log⁡b(64/25)+log⁡b(243/4)\log_b(125/81)+\log_b(64/25)+\log_b(243/4).

12581⋅6425⋅2434=5334⋅2652⋅3522=5⋅24⋅3=240.\frac{125}{81}\cdot\frac{64}{25}\cdot\frac{243}{4}=\frac{5^3}{3^4}\cdot\frac{2^6}{5^2}\cdot\frac{3^5}{2^2}=5\cdot2^4\cdot3=240.

Therefore the sum is log⁡b240=log⁡b5+4log⁡b2+log⁡b3\log_b240=\log_b5+4\log_b2+\log_b3. The coefficient 4 belongs to log⁡b2\log_b2: the surviving factor is 242^4, not 2. Rebuilding 5×16×35\times16\times3 confirms 240.

Pause. Think. Try.

1. After simplifying the worked product 240=5⋅24⋅3240=5\cdot2^4\cdot3, what is the coefficient of log⁡b2\log_b2?
A hint, pleaseThe coefficient comes from an exponent, not the value of the power.
Read the answer and explanation

44

log⁡b(24)=4log⁡b2\log_b(2^4)=4\log_b2, so the coefficient is 4.
2. Write log⁡b(63/32)=Alog⁡b7+Blog⁡b2+Clog⁡b3+Dlog⁡b5\log_b(63/32)=A\log_b7+B\log_b2+C\log_b3+D\log_b5. Which tuple is correct?
A hint, pleaseFactor 63=7⋅3263=7\cdot3^2 and 32=2532=2^5.
Read the answer and explanation

(1,−5,2,0)(1,-5,2,0)

The expansion is log⁡b7+2log⁡b3−5log⁡b2\log_b7+2\log_b3-5\log_b2. There is no factor 5, so (A,B,C,D)=(1,−5,2,0)(A,B,C,D)=(1,-5,2,0).
PUT IT TOGETHER

Your chapter checkpoint

Mix the ideas. Try each question before opening its explanation.

1. For x,y>0x,y>0, condense 2ln⁡x−ln⁡y2\ln x-\ln y.
A hint, pleaseFirst turn the coefficient 2 into an argument power.
Read the answer and explanation

ln⁡(x2/y)\ln(x^2/y)

2ln⁡x=ln⁡(x2)2\ln x=\ln(x^2), then the subtraction gives ln⁡(x2/y)\ln(x^2/y). The stated positive domain makes all steps valid.
2. Evaluate log⁡1/84\log_{1/8}4.
A hint, pleaseWrite 1/8=2−31/8=2^{-3} and 4=224=2^2.
Read the answer and explanation

−2/3-2/3

log⁡2−322=2/(−3)=−2/3\log_{2^{-3}}2^2=2/(-3)=-2/3. Directly, (1/8)−2/3=4(1/8)^{-2/3}=4.
3. At x=−2x=-2, which correctly evaluates ln⁡(x2)\ln(x^2)?
A hint, pleaseThe logarithm sees the square, not the unsquared negative number.
Read the answer and explanation

It is ln⁡4=2ln⁡2\ln4=2\ln2.

The argument is (−2)2=4>0(-2)^2=4>0. The safe expansion is 2ln⁡∣x∣=2ln⁡22\ln|x|=2\ln2.

Write the reasoning

Show the domain, the key steps and a check of your answer.

A complete coefficient challenge

For a valid common base bb, simplify log⁡b(625/27)+log⁡b(64/8)+log⁡b(18/56)\log_b(625/27)+\log_b(64/8)+\log_b(18/56). Give the coefficients of log⁡b5,log⁡b7,log⁡b3,log⁡b2\log_b5,\log_b7,\log_b3,\log_b2, in that order.

Compare your solution

All three arguments are positive, so condense their sum. The exact product is

5433⋅23⋅3222⋅7=54⋅23⋅7=125021.\frac{5^4}{3^3}\cdot2^3\cdot\frac{3^2}{2^2\cdot7}=\frac{5^4\cdot2}{3\cdot7}=\frac{1250}{21}.

Its logarithm is 4log⁡b5+log⁡b2−log⁡b3−log⁡b74\log_b5+\log_b2-\log_b3-\log_b7. The requested coefficients are therefore (4,−1,−1,1)(4,-1,-1,1). Multiplying the prime powers back gives 625×2/(3×7)=1250/21625\times2/(3\times7)=1250/21, confirming both negative signs.

Expand without losing negative inputs

Find the real domain of F(x)=log⁡5(x2/(x+1))F(x)=\log_5\bigl(x^2/(x+1)\bigr), and expand it in a form valid on that whole domain.

Compare your solution

The argument must be positive. At x=0x=0 it is zero; at x=−1x=-1 the denominator is zero. For all other xx, the numerator x2x^2 is positive, so the quotient is positive exactly when x+1>0x+1>0. The domain is (−1,0)∪(0,∞)(-1,0)\cup(0,\infty).

On this domain, both x2x^2 and x+1x+1 are positive, giving

F(x)=log⁡5(x2)−log⁡5(x+1)=2log⁡5∣x∣−log⁡5(x+1).F(x)=\log_5(x^2)-\log_5(x+1)=2\log_5|x|-\log_5(x+1).

For example, x=−1/2x=-1/2 is allowed: its original argument is (1/4)/(1/2)=1/2>0(1/4)/(1/2)=1/2>0. Using 2log⁡5x2\log_5 x would wrongly remove this valid input.

Class 11 milestone

You can turn a calculation into a structure

You can recognise products, quotients and powers—and keep the domain while rewriting them. Try the prime-factor example backwards, then explore what logarithms look like on a graph.